Circle - Revision history

Lfox at 22:37, 22 April 2024

2024-04-22T22:37:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 22 April 2024
Line 24:		Line 24:

	By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which a uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.		By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which a uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.

			== Uniformity ==
			There are many ways to measure the uniformity of a circle. In standard math jargon, such measurements tells us about how far away our circle is from a "perfect" circle.

			An example of one such measurement is we could find the center of mass of the circle, then take the ratio of the distance from the closest point on the circle to the center, and the farthest point on the circle from the center.

			As the uniformity of a circle (specified in the above paragraph) gets closer to 1, the ratio of its circumference to its diameter gets closer to the quantity that standard mathematics calls π.

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Lfox at 03:26, 21 January 2024

2024-01-21T03:26:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 21 January 2024
Line 24:		Line 24:

	By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which a uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.		By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which a uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.

			== See also ==

			* [[π]], the ratio of the circumference and diameter of a circle.

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==

	<references group="note" />		<references group="note" />

Lfox: /* The traditional concept */

2024-01-21T00:24:46Z

The traditional concept

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 21 January 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical'' to do so!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather a worldly representation of a circle. It is supposed to be imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform.		Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical'' to do so!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather a worldly representation of a circle. It is supposed to be imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform.

	By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.		By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which a uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==

	<references group="note" />		<references group="note" />

Lfox: /* Circles */

2024-01-21T00:23:45Z

Circles

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:23, 21 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''circle''' is a closed [[curve]] on a [[plane]], which is equidistant from ~~a point~~. A circle should be distinguished from the closely related concept of a [[loop]], or an <math>S^1</math>. To emphasize the distinction from loops, a circle is sometimes called a '''rigid circle'''.		A '''circle''' is a closed [[curve]] on a [[plane]], which is equidistant from its center. A circle should be distinguished from the closely related concept of a [[loop]], or an <math>S^1</math>. To emphasize the distinction from loops, a circle is sometimes called a '''rigid circle'''.

			Circles are first-level [[Concept\|concepts]], meaning that they refer directly to percepts.

	Circles are one of the central concepts objects of [[Euclidean geometry\|classical geometry]].		Circles are one of the central concepts objects of [[Euclidean geometry\|classical geometry]].
Line 7:		Line 9:
	=== Circles ===		=== Circles ===
	[[File:Circle.png\|thumb\|Figure 1: A circle. ]]		[[File:Circle.png\|thumb\|Figure 1: A circle. ]]
	An example of circle can be seen in figure (1).<ref name=":0" group="note" />		An example of circle can be seen in figure (1).<ref name=":0" group="note" />

			The letter O is a circle.

	=== Non-circles ===		=== Non-circles ===
	The letter Ω is not a circle, because it is not a closed curve.		The letter Ω is not a circle, because it is not a closed curve.

			The number 0 is not a circle, because it is not equidistant from its center.

	== The traditional concept ==		== The traditional concept ==
	In standard mathematics, a circle means a ''perfect'' circle. A perfect circle is like a circle, except that it is supposed to lie in a completely flat and infinitely thin plane, the curve of the circle is supposed to have no width, and distance from the circle to its center is supposed to be completely uniform.		In standard mathematics, a circle means a ''perfect'' circle. A perfect circle is like a circle, except that it is supposed to lie in a completely flat and infinitely thin plane, the curve of the circle is supposed to have no width, and the distance from the circle to its center is supposed to be completely uniform.

	Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather a worldly representation of a circle. It is supposed to be imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform.		Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical'' to do so!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather a worldly representation of a circle. It is supposed to be imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform.

	By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.		By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.

Lfox: /* Notes */

2024-01-21T00:17:25Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 21 January 2024
Line 13:		Line 13:

	== The traditional concept ==		== The traditional concept ==
	In standard mathematics, a circle means a ''perfect'' circle. A perfect circle is like a circle, except that it is supposed to lie in a ~~perfectly~~ flat and infinitely thin plane, the curve of the circle is supposed to have no width, and distance from the circle to its center is supposed to be ~~perfectly~~ uniform.		In standard mathematics, a circle means a ''perfect'' circle. A perfect circle is like a circle, except that it is supposed to lie in a completely flat and infinitely thin plane, the curve of the circle is supposed to have no width, and distance from the circle to its center is supposed to be completely uniform.

	Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather ~~an imperfect~~ representation of a circle. It is imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform. By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref>		Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather a worldly representation of a circle. It is supposed to be imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform.

			By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were in the beginning stages of drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref> Furthermore, Objective Mathematics would not say, as an absolute, that figure (1) is "imperfect." To be imperfect is to contain errors. An error presupposes a purposes a purpose or goal, but there is no purpose or goal that is intrinsic to the circle. There is no absolute sense in which uniform circle contains fewer errors than a nonuniform circle; neither can be said to contain errors intrinsically; each simply is what it is. It is only when we plan to use a circle towards some end, that we may say of it that it is perfect or imperfect.

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==

	<references group="note" />		<references group="note" />

Lfox: /* Notes */

2024-01-20T23:55:20Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 20 January 2024
Line 7:		Line 7:
	=== Circles ===		=== Circles ===
	[[File:Circle.png\|thumb\|Figure 1: A circle. ]]		[[File:Circle.png\|thumb\|Figure 1: A circle. ]]
	An example of circle can be seen in figure (1).		An example of circle can be seen in figure (1).<ref name=":0" group="note" />

	=== Non-circles ===		=== Non-circles ===
Line 15:		Line 15:
	In standard mathematics, a circle means a ''perfect'' circle. A perfect circle is like a circle, except that it is supposed to lie in a perfectly flat and infinitely thin plane, the curve of the circle is supposed to have no width, and distance from the circle to its center is supposed to be perfectly uniform.		In standard mathematics, a circle means a ''perfect'' circle. A perfect circle is like a circle, except that it is supposed to lie in a perfectly flat and infinitely thin plane, the curve of the circle is supposed to have no width, and distance from the circle to its center is supposed to be perfectly uniform.

	Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather an imperfect representation of a circle. It is imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform. By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are ~~considering sketches of~~ math concepts, we ~~may~~ identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing a precision scientific instrument, ~~we probably wouldn~~'t identify it as a circle. </ref>		Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather an imperfect representation of a circle. It is imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform. By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note" name=":0">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are learning about math concepts, it is reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were drawing a sketch of the moon, it would also be reasonable to identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing the blueprint for a precision scientific instrument, it would ''not'' be reasonable to identify it as a circle. </ref>

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==

	<references group="note" />		<references group="note" />

Lfox at 23:51, 20 January 2024

2024-01-20T23:51:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 20 January 2024
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather an imperfect representation of a circle. It is imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform. By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are considering sketches of math concepts, we may identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing a precision scientific instrument, we probably wouldn't identify it as a circle. </ref>		Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather an imperfect representation of a circle. It is imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform. By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are considering sketches of math concepts, we may identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing a precision scientific instrument, we probably wouldn't identify it as a circle. </ref>

			== Notes ==

			<references group="note" />

Lfox at 23:50, 20 January 2024

2024-01-20T23:50:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, 20 January 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	=== Circles ===		=== Circles ===
			[[File:Circle.png\|thumb\|Figure 1: A circle. ]]
			An example of circle can be seen in figure (1).

	=== Non-circles ===		=== Non-circles ===
			The letter Ω is not a circle, because it is not a closed curve.

			== The traditional concept ==
			In standard mathematics, a circle means a ''perfect'' circle. A perfect circle is like a circle, except that it is supposed to lie in a perfectly flat and infinitely thin plane, the curve of the circle is supposed to have no width, and distance from the circle to its center is supposed to be perfectly uniform.

			Although standard mathematicians commonly describe things like figure (1) as circles (because it's ''practical''!!), if they are being careful then they will say figure (1) is technically not a circle, but rather an imperfect representation of a circle. It is imperfect because it has nonzero thickness, and because its distance from its center is not uniform. By contrast, Objective Mathematics says that figure (1) literally ''is'' a circle.<ref group="note">Whether or not figure (1) is deemed a circle depends on context. In our present context, where we are considering sketches of math concepts, we may identify it as a circle. If the context was that we were designing a precision scientific instrument, we probably wouldn't identify it as a circle. </ref>

Lfox: Created page with "A '''circle''' is a closed curve on a plane, which is equidistant from a point. A circle should be distinguished from the closely related concept of a loop, or an $S^1$ . To emphasize the distinction from loops, a circle is sometimes called a '''rigid circle'''. Circles are one of the central concepts objects of classical geometry. == Examples == === Circles === === Non-circles ==="

2024-01-20T23:21:36Z

Created page with "A '''circle''' is a closed curve on a plane, which is equidistant from a point. A circle should be distinguished from the closely related concept of a loop, or an <math>S^1</math>. To emphasize the distinction from loops, a circle is sometimes called a '''rigid circle'''. Circles are one of the central concepts objects of classical geometry. == Examples == === Circles === === Non-circles ==="

New page

A '''circle''' is a closed [[curve]] on a [[plane]], which is equidistant from a point. A circle should be distinguished from the closely related concept of a [[loop]], or an <math>S^1</math>. To emphasize the distinction from loops, a circle is sometimes called a '''rigid circle'''.

Circles are one of the central concepts objects of [[Euclidean geometry|classical geometry]].

== Examples ==

=== Circles ===

=== Non-circles ===