Magnitude: Difference between revisions

From Objective Mathematics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A '''magnitude''' is a quantity with no restriction on how it can be divided into parts.<ref>Aristotle, ''Metaphysics'', Book V, Ch. 11-14</ref>")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''magnitude''' is a quantity with no restriction on how it can be divided into parts.<ref>Aristotle, ''Metaphysics'', Book V, Ch. 11-14</ref>
A '''magnitude''' is a [[quantity]] with no restriction on how it can be divided into parts.<ref>Aristotle, ''Metaphysics'', Book V, Ch. 11-14</ref> [TODO I'm not a huge fan of this definition.]
 
== Ratio ==
A '''ratio''' is an identification of two [[Multitude|multitudes]].
 
[TODO I mean that you identify them together, you equate one with the other. I do not mean that you say "ah this multitude is 5, and that multitude is 6." I'm not sure how to make this clear from the language.]
 
To '''take the ratio''' between two multitudes is to identify them together.
 
[TODO why can't I say it's the identification of a quantitative relationship between two multitudes? lol. Too vague?]
 
Just like in the case of natural numbers, it turns out that many of these identifications will be the same.  [TODO ?]
 
I'll represent a multitude with the following notation. Suppose I identify <math>x</math> As with <math>y</math> Bs, where <math>x,y : \mathbb{N}</math>. Then I denote the ratio by <math>[x : y]_{A,B}</math>.
 
=== Examples ===
6 slices is the same as 1 pizza.
 
100 pennies is the same as 1 dollar.
 
1000 mm is the same as 1 meter.
 
36 inches is the same as 3 feet.
 
=== Facts about ratios ===
Suppose I identify 3 As with 5 Bs. Then if I have a multitude of As given by any multiple of 3, that's the same as having a multitude of Bs given by the same multiple of 5.
 
The general principle here is that <math display="block">[x : y]_{A,B} = [n x : n y]_{A,B}, \text{ for any } n : \mathbb{N}.</math>
 
Now, suppose that I identify 3 As with 5 Bs, and I ''also'' identify 5 Bs with 2 Cs. Then clearly, I may also identify 3 As with 2 Cs.
 
The general principle here is that <math display="block">\text{if } [x : y]_{A,B} \text{ and } [y : z]_{B,C} \text{ then } [x: z]_{A,C}</math> [TODO this doesn't make sense....]
 
== References ==

Latest revision as of 20:43, 2 July 2024

A magnitude is a quantity with no restriction on how it can be divided into parts.[1] [TODO I'm not a huge fan of this definition.]

Ratio

A ratio is an identification of two multitudes.

[TODO I mean that you identify them together, you equate one with the other. I do not mean that you say "ah this multitude is 5, and that multitude is 6." I'm not sure how to make this clear from the language.]

To take the ratio between two multitudes is to identify them together.

[TODO why can't I say it's the identification of a quantitative relationship between two multitudes? lol. Too vague?]

Just like in the case of natural numbers, it turns out that many of these identifications will be the same. [TODO ?]

I'll represent a multitude with the following notation. Suppose I identify As with Bs, where . Then I denote the ratio by .

Examples

6 slices is the same as 1 pizza.

100 pennies is the same as 1 dollar.

1000 mm is the same as 1 meter.

36 inches is the same as 3 feet.

Facts about ratios

Suppose I identify 3 As with 5 Bs. Then if I have a multitude of As given by any multiple of 3, that's the same as having a multitude of Bs given by the same multiple of 5.

The general principle here is that

Now, suppose that I identify 3 As with 5 Bs, and I also identify 5 Bs with 2 Cs. Then clearly, I may also identify 3 As with 2 Cs.

The general principle here is that

[TODO this doesn't make sense....]

References

  1. Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book V, Ch. 11-14