Magnitude: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''magnitude''' is a quantity with no restriction on how it can be divided into parts.<ref>Aristotle, ''Metaphysics'', Book V, Ch. 11-14</ref> | A '''magnitude''' is a [[quantity]] with no restriction on how it can be divided into parts.<ref>Aristotle, ''Metaphysics'', Book V, Ch. 11-14</ref> [TODO I'm not a huge fan of this definition.] | ||
== Ratio == | |||
A '''ratio''' is an identification of two [[Multitude|multitudes]]. | |||
[TODO I mean that you identify them together, you equate one with the other. I do not mean that you say "ah this multitude is 5, and that multitude is 6." I'm not sure how to make this clear from the language.] | |||
To '''take the ratio''' between two multitudes is to identify them together. | |||
[TODO why can't I say it's the identification of a quantitative relationship between two multitudes? lol. Too vague?] | |||
Just like in the case of natural numbers, it turns out that many of these identifications will be the same. [TODO ?] | |||
I'll represent a multitude with the following notation. Suppose I identify <math>x</math> As with <math>y</math> Bs, where <math>x,y : \mathbb{N}</math>. Then I denote the ratio by <math>[x : y]_{A,B}</math>. | |||
=== Examples === | |||
6 slices is the same as 1 pizza. | |||
100 pennies is the same as 1 dollar. | |||
1000 mm is the same as 1 meter. | |||
36 inches is the same as 3 feet. | |||
=== Facts about ratios === | |||
Suppose I identify 3 As with 5 Bs. Then if I have a multitude of As given by any multiple of 3, that's the same as having a multitude of Bs given by the same multiple of 5. | |||
The general principle here is that <math display="block">[x : y]_{A,B} = [n x : n y]_{A,B}, \text{ for any } n : \mathbb{N}.</math> | |||
Now, suppose that I identify 3 As with 5 Bs, and I ''also'' identify 5 Bs with 2 Cs. Then clearly, I may also identify 3 As with 2 Cs. | |||
The general principle here is that <math display="block">\text{if } [x : y]_{A,B} \text{ and } [y : z]_{B,C} \text{ then } [x: z]_{A,C}</math> [TODO this doesn't make sense....] | |||
== References == | == References == |
Latest revision as of 20:43, 2 July 2024
A magnitude is a quantity with no restriction on how it can be divided into parts.[1] [TODO I'm not a huge fan of this definition.]
Ratio
A ratio is an identification of two multitudes.
[TODO I mean that you identify them together, you equate one with the other. I do not mean that you say "ah this multitude is 5, and that multitude is 6." I'm not sure how to make this clear from the language.]
To take the ratio between two multitudes is to identify them together.
[TODO why can't I say it's the identification of a quantitative relationship between two multitudes? lol. Too vague?]
Just like in the case of natural numbers, it turns out that many of these identifications will be the same. [TODO ?]
I'll represent a multitude with the following notation. Suppose I identify As with Bs, where . Then I denote the ratio by .
Examples
6 slices is the same as 1 pizza.
100 pennies is the same as 1 dollar.
1000 mm is the same as 1 meter.
36 inches is the same as 3 feet.
Facts about ratios
Suppose I identify 3 As with 5 Bs. Then if I have a multitude of As given by any multiple of 3, that's the same as having a multitude of Bs given by the same multiple of 5.
The general principle here is that
Now, suppose that I identify 3 As with 5 Bs, and I also identify 5 Bs with 2 Cs. Then clearly, I may also identify 3 As with 2 Cs.
The general principle here is that
References
- ↑ Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book V, Ch. 11-14