Integer: Difference between revisions

From Objective Mathematics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''integer''' is a concept measuring the difference between two multitudes, considered as two members of an ordered set. In Objective Mathematics, the concept of integer is often denoted by a symbol, <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>.
An '''integer''' is a concept measuring the difference between two multitudes, considered as the two members of an [[Order|ordered]] [[Set|pair]]. In Objective Mathematics, the concept of integer is often denoted by a symbol, <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>.
 
== Examples of integers ==
In this section, I will give examples of concretes subsumed under specific integers, like -2, 0, and 3.
 
Consider two piles of apples. Suppose that the two piles are ordered, so that we may refer to one as "pile #1" and the other as "pile #2."
 
* If pile #1 contains 3 apples, and pile #2 contains 5 apples, then together they are a unit of the concept "-2."
* If pile #1 contains 71 apples, and pile #2 contains 71 apples, then together they are a unit of the concept "0."
* If pile #1 contains 3 apples, and pile #2 is empty (contains no apples), then together they are a unit of the concept "3."


== Differences ==
== Differences ==
Line 17: Line 26:


== Signed differences ==
== Signed differences ==
[TODO this section needs a lot of work]
A difference is something that is identified with respect to two quantities. For a difference, the ''order'' of the two quantities does not matter; the difference between the smaller and the larger is the same as the difference between the larger and the smaller.  
A difference is something that is identified with respect to two quantities. For a difference, the ''order'' of the two quantities does not matter; the difference between the smaller and the larger is the same as the difference between the larger and the smaller.  


Line 29: Line 40:


in fact there is a [[symmetry]] between them.
in fact there is a [[symmetry]] between them.
== Addition of integers ==
'''To add''' two integers <math>n</math> and <math>m</math> is to regard them as a single ordered pair <math>p</math>, such that the first element of <math>p</math> is the [[Natural number#Addition|sum]] of the multitudes in the first element of <math>n</math> and the first element of <math>m</math>, and such that the second element of <math>p</math> is the sum of the multitudes of the second element of <math>n</math> and the second element of <math>m</math>. The resulting integer is denoted by <math>n + m</math>.
In symbolic notation, <math>(n,m) + (a,b) := (n + a, m + b)</math>.
== Negation of integers ==
'''To negate''' an integer <math>n</math> is to reverse the ordering of the pair to which it refers. The negation of <math>n</math> is denoted by <math>-n</math>.
== Multiplication of integers ==
The idea is that we will define<math>(n,m)\times (p,q) := (np + mq, nq + mp) </math>, but it is difficult to justify.
[TODO]
== The traditional concept ==
[TODO needs a lot of work]
The integers are sometimes taken as an irreducible primary in mathematics. Leopold Kronecker said[TODO citation needed]<blockquote>God made the integers; all else is the work of man. </blockquote>and I think this quote is famous because some mathematicians sympathize with it.
Integers are literally taken as an irreducible primary by ZFC set theory, which has the axiom of infinity (TODO write something else. Calling this the integers, and not---say, the natural numbers---is an oversimplification.)
=== The Grothendieck construction ===
There's a construction I have seen called the Grothendieck construction, which is in some ways similar to Objective Mathematics' way of viewing the integers. The idea is to view the integers as the set <math>\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} / \sim</math>, where <math>(n,m) \sim (p,q) </math> if there exists some <math>k \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that <math>(p,q) = (n + k, m + k)</math>.
I am sure that versions of it long predates Grothendieck, but it was made famous by Grothendieck because it's the starting point of K theory.

Revision as of 00:00, 3 February 2024

An integer is a concept measuring the difference between two multitudes, considered as the two members of an ordered pair. In Objective Mathematics, the concept of integer is often denoted by a symbol, .

Examples of integers

In this section, I will give examples of concretes subsumed under specific integers, like -2, 0, and 3.

Consider two piles of apples. Suppose that the two piles are ordered, so that we may refer to one as "pile #1" and the other as "pile #2."

  • If pile #1 contains 3 apples, and pile #2 contains 5 apples, then together they are a unit of the concept "-2."
  • If pile #1 contains 71 apples, and pile #2 contains 71 apples, then together they are a unit of the concept "0."
  • If pile #1 contains 3 apples, and pile #2 is empty (contains no apples), then together they are a unit of the concept "3."

Differences

The difference between two quantities A and B, is the quantity which would have to be added to the lesser quantity in order to make it equal to the greater quantity.

In the case where there is no difference between A and B, we say that the difference between them is zero, or 0.

Examples

The difference between a pile consisting of 3 apples, and a pile consisting of 5 apples, is 2 apples.

The difference between a pile consisting of 5 apples, and a pile consisting of 3 apples, is 2 apples.

The difference between 3 and 5 is 2.

Non-examples

"A difference between me and my friend is that I like chocolate ice cream, but he doesn't." This is a perfectly valid use of the concept of difference, but it's not a difference of quantities.

Signed differences

[TODO this section needs a lot of work]

A difference is something that is identified with respect to two quantities. For a difference, the order of the two quantities does not matter; the difference between the smaller and the larger is the same as the difference between the larger and the smaller.

A signed difference, which Objective Mathematics sometimes calls a sifference, is a concept much like a difference, except that it keeps track of the order the two quantities under consideration. Let A and B denote two quantities, where A is greater than or equal to B. The sifference between A and B is the difference between A and B; the sifference between B and A is the difference between A and B, but with a slight asterisk to remind us about the order.

Describing things like I have, in the English language, may give the reader a slightly incorrect idea, because "and" is often considered to be symmetrical. Indeed, "Bob and Jane" usually means the same thing as "Jane and Bob." In our context, however, it is very important to distinguish between the two noun phrases. This emphasis on the order of "and" is not completely foreign to English, however: authors know that at times, the subtle change in emphasis between "Bob and Jane" and "Jane and Bob" matters.

Symbolically, we write the sifference between and as , and we write the sifference between and as .

Examples

The difference between a pile consisting of 3 apples, and a pile consisting of 5 apples, is 2 apples.

in fact there is a symmetry between them.

Addition of integers

To add two integers and is to regard them as a single ordered pair , such that the first element of is the sum of the multitudes in the first element of and the first element of , and such that the second element of is the sum of the multitudes of the second element of and the second element of . The resulting integer is denoted by .

In symbolic notation, .

Negation of integers

To negate an integer is to reverse the ordering of the pair to which it refers. The negation of is denoted by .

Multiplication of integers

The idea is that we will define, but it is difficult to justify.

[TODO]

The traditional concept

[TODO needs a lot of work]

The integers are sometimes taken as an irreducible primary in mathematics. Leopold Kronecker said[TODO citation needed]

God made the integers; all else is the work of man.

and I think this quote is famous because some mathematicians sympathize with it.

Integers are literally taken as an irreducible primary by ZFC set theory, which has the axiom of infinity (TODO write something else. Calling this the integers, and not---say, the natural numbers---is an oversimplification.)

The Grothendieck construction

There's a construction I have seen called the Grothendieck construction, which is in some ways similar to Objective Mathematics' way of viewing the integers. The idea is to view the integers as the set , where if there exists some such that .

I am sure that versions of it long predates Grothendieck, but it was made famous by Grothendieck because it's the starting point of K theory.