|
|
Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
| |
|
| More generally, if <math>\nu : \mathbb{Q}_{>0}</math> is the nill cutoff (where we also assume <math>\nu \leq 1</math>), then <math>f(x) = x^3</math> is only "differentiable" in the region <math display="block">-\frac{1}{3}(1 + \nu) < x < \frac{1}{3}(1 - \nu)</math>This seems like an absurd conclusion. | | More generally, if <math>\nu : \mathbb{Q}_{>0}</math> is the nill cutoff (where we also assume <math>\nu \leq 1</math>), then <math>f(x) = x^3</math> is only "differentiable" in the region <math display="block">-\frac{1}{3}(1 + \nu) < x < \frac{1}{3}(1 - \nu)</math>This seems like an absurd conclusion. |
| | |
| | == Polynomial derivatives == |
| | Interesting vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW4jM0smS_E |
Revision as of 04:25, 23 April 2024
Let
be a function, and let
. I define
by

I say that

is
differentiable at

, if

is
nill whenever

are both nill.
If
is differentiable at
, then I define the derivative of
at
as
, for some nill
.
Criticism
This definition makes things way more complicated. I will demonstrate this with the following example.
Let's suppose that
so
and
. And let's say that we are in a context where anything with absolute value below 0.1 is nill. Let
and
. Then
. This quantity is greater than 0.1, and thus non-nill, when
, so we reach the seemingly absurd conclusion that
is not differentiable where
.
More generally, if
is the nill cutoff (where we also assume
), then
is only "differentiable" in the region

This seems like an absurd conclusion.
Polynomial derivatives
Interesting vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW4jM0smS_E