Derivative: Difference between revisions

From Objective Mathematics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


More generally, if <math>\nu : \mathbb{Q}_{>0}</math> is the nill cutoff (where we also assume <math>\nu \leq 1</math>), then <math>f(x) = x^3</math> is only "differentiable" in the region <math display="block">-\frac{1}{3}(1 + \nu) < x < \frac{1}{3}(1 - \nu)</math>This seems like an absurd conclusion.
More generally, if <math>\nu : \mathbb{Q}_{>0}</math> is the nill cutoff (where we also assume <math>\nu \leq 1</math>), then <math>f(x) = x^3</math> is only "differentiable" in the region <math display="block">-\frac{1}{3}(1 + \nu) < x < \frac{1}{3}(1 - \nu)</math>This seems like an absurd conclusion.
== Polynomial derivatives ==
Interesting vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW4jM0smS_E

Revision as of 04:25, 23 April 2024

Let be a function, and let . I define by

I say that is differentiable at , if is nill whenever are both nill.

If is differentiable at , then I define the derivative of at as , for some nill .

Criticism

This definition makes things way more complicated. I will demonstrate this with the following example.

Let's suppose that so and . And let's say that we are in a context where anything with absolute value below 0.1 is nill. Let and . Then . This quantity is greater than 0.1, and thus non-nill, when , so we reach the seemingly absurd conclusion that is not differentiable where .

More generally, if is the nill cutoff (where we also assume ), then is only "differentiable" in the region

This seems like an absurd conclusion.

Polynomial derivatives

Interesting vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW4jM0smS_E