Sequences

From Objective Mathematics
Revision as of 00:16, 16 January 2024 by Lfox (talk | contribs) (created page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From my email to RS

 I have noticed that there are many specific "infinite sets" that I think are---or rather, are philosophically sloppy stand-ins for---valid concepts. For example, the infinite (ordered) set could be properly thought of as that concept which---in appropriate contexts---subsumes the following concretes:

  • the method that a child uses to produce the nth odd number
  • a C++ program which takes in a uint32, n, and outputs 2n+1
  • the following table on my screen [a screenshot of a few rows of an excel table where the entries are 2*row + 1 ]
  • etc.

Or the infinite set is just a stand-in for the concept of natural numbers, which subsumes the concepts 1, 2, 3, etc, which in turn subsume concretes like 1 apple, 2 oranges, 3 bananas, etc.