Let
, and let
. I define
by

I say that

is
differentiable at

, if

is
nill whenever

are both nill.
If
is differentiable at
, then I define the derivative of
at
as
, for some nill
.
Criticism
This definition makes things way more complicated. I will demonstrate this with the following example. Let's suppose that
, so
and
. And let's say that we are in a context where anything with absolute value below 1.0 is nill. Let
and
. Then
. This is greater than 1 when
, so we reach the seemingly absurd conclusion that
is not differentiable where
.
This complication is not present in the standard definition of derivative, where the remainder terms go away in the limit and we are just left with
. It's not completely clear whether or not this complication is a problem.